
ON THIS PAGE
Ask everyone, ask once with at most one polite follow-up, and never offer anything in exchange for a review. That last part is not just etiquette anymore. As of October 2024, it is federal law.
The FTC’s rule on consumer reviews bans buying fake reviews, offering incentives tied to a specific rating, and selectively soliciting only your happiest customers while quietly steering unhappy ones elsewhere. Google’s own review policy has separately banned review gating since 2018, and it added new restrictions in April 2026 targeting staff quotas and employee-name solicitation. So before you touch timing and templates, it is worth understanding what you are not allowed to do. The businesses getting burned right now are not the ones asking wrong. They are the ones gating.
What “Asking Wrong” Actually Costs You Now
The FTC’s Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials took effect October 21, 2024, with civil penalties up to $53,088 per violation for knowing violations. It bans four things directly relevant to how you ask for reviews: paying or incentivizing anyone for a review conditioned on what it says, soliciting reviews from people who never actually used your product or service, review gating (filtering only happy customers toward the public review, redirecting unhappy ones to a private form), and undisclosed reviews from employees or people with a financial connection to your business.
The FTC isn’t bluffing on enforcement. In December 2025, it sent warning letters to a batch of companies over practices like “compensating employees for obtaining five-star reviews from friends and family” and soliciting reviews from people with no actual experience with the business. Each letter cited that $53,088-per-violation figure. Two multi-count settlements in the review-manipulation space, TruHeight and Growth Cave, produced judgments in the tens of millions of dollars, though most of those amounts were suspended based on the companies’ ability to pay.
Google’s terms add a second layer. Its Maps user-generated content policy has long banned discouraging negative reviews or selectively soliciting positive ones, and offering any incentive, including cash, discounts, or giveaway entries, in exchange for a review. As of April 2026, Google tightened this further: no more asking staff to hit a review quota, and no more directing customers to mention a specific employee’s name in their review.
None of this means you can’t ask for reviews. It means you ask everyone the same way, and you never filter, incentivize, or script what they say.
The Version That Actually Works
Send the request fast. Within 24 to 48 hours of the interaction, while it’s still fresh. A quick text right after a service call performs better than an email sent a week later, when the details have already blurred.
Use SMS for speed, email for depth. Text messages get opened within minutes and see meaningfully higher completion rates than email, largely because a customer can tap a link and leave a rating without switching apps. Email still has a role for more detailed feedback or a slower-moving relationship, but if your goal is a quick Google review, text wins.
Make it one tap. Every extra step between “here’s the link” and a submitted review costs you responses. Send a direct link to your Google review page, not your homepage. Do not make the customer hunt for where to leave feedback.
Follow up once, gently. A single reminder a few days later recovers real response volume. A second or third reminder mostly generates opt-outs and irritation. Set a hard stop after one follow-up.
Ask everyone. Every single customer, every time, regardless of how the interaction went. This is the part businesses skip because it feels inefficient. Why ask someone who complained? Selective asking is the exact behavior the FTC now defines as gating. Consistency also produces a more honest, more defensible rating over time.
What Compliant Language Actually Looks Like
Use this: “Thanks for choosing us. We’d love your honest feedback on Google. Here’s the link.” Sent to every customer, no filtering, no strings attached.
Not this: “Had a great experience? Leave us a 5-star review!” That’s selective solicitation dressed up as a compliment, and it’s the textbook definition of gating.
Not this either: “Leave a review and get 10% off your next visit.” That’s an incentive tied to leaving a review, which the FTC rule now prohibits outright regardless of whether you specify a rating.
And skip this, even though it sounds harmless: “Please mention Alex in your review.” Google’s April 2026 policy update specifically bans asking customers to name a particular staff member.
Why the Old Playbook Broke
For years, “only ask happy customers” was standard advice in the review-management world. It quietly filtered unhappy customers to a private feedback form while routing satisfied ones to Google. Fashion Nova paid $4.2 million to settle FTC charges over exactly this practice in 2022, and it is precisely what the 2024 rule was written to formalize into an outright ban rather than an occasional enforcement target. The businesses still running that playbook in 2026 are not operating in a gray area anymore. They are operating in violation of a specific, published rule with a specific per-violation penalty.
The upside is that asking everyone equally isn’t actually worse for your rating. Consumers have gotten skeptical of suspiciously perfect scores. Research on trust and star ratings consistently finds a “sweet spot” somewhere around 4.2 to 4.5 stars performs better with buyers than a flawless 5.0, which a meaningful share of shoppers now read as manufactured. A rating built on asking everyone, with the occasional honest three-star mixed in, reads as more credible than one that looks curated.
Where Repuvo Fits
This is the exact workflow Repuvo enforces by design: every customer gets the same request, on the same timeline, with no gating logic sitting behind the scenes. That is not a compliance workaround bolted on after the fact. It is the operating model, because a review request tool that cannot selectively solicit cannot accidentally violate the rule that is now on the books.
FAQ
Is it illegal to offer a small discount for leaving a review? Yes, under the FTC’s October 2024 rule, any incentive tied to writing a review is prohibited, regardless of whether you specify what rating to leave.
Can I ask a happy customer for a review right after a good interaction? Yes, as long as you ask every customer the same way, not just the ones who seemed satisfied. The problem isn’t asking after a good moment; it’s skipping the request for anyone else.
How many times should I follow up if a customer doesn’t respond? Once. A single reminder a few days after the first request recovers meaningful response volume without generating the opt-outs and complaints that come with repeated follow-ups.
Can employees leave reviews for the business they work at? Not without clear disclosure of the employment relationship. The FTC rule specifically addresses undisclosed insider reviews as a form of review manipulation.
Bottom Line
Ask fast, ask everyone, ask once more if needed, and never attach an incentive or a filter to the request. The compliance rules are not a reason to ask less. They are a reason to ask better, and a consistent, unfiltered process usually earns more trust than a curated one ever did.
EXPLORE REPUVO
Sources and further reading
Repuvo / NEXT STEP
Keep reputation work deliberate, not reactive.
See the Repuvo workflowKEEP READING
